Fast, RAPID, Reliable, Trustworthy and Quick Divorces! 2400 N. Tenaya Way Ste 130
Fast, RAPID, Reliable, Trustworthy and Quick Divorces! 2400 N. Tenaya Way Ste 130




Terms concerning child custody are among the most frequently scrutinized by judges. Parties should take heed that an unfair, although well intentioned, custodial arrangement, may be cause for questions from the court. The court has the duty to determine if the custodial arrangement is within the best interest of the minor child, irrespective of the parties' mutual agreement. NRS 125C.0035. For example, a judge may question whether it is in the best interest of the minor children to be separated from their sibling if the parents decide to simply split the two children.

Child support is another area that is also heavily scrutinized. But if an otherwise unbalanced arrangement can still suit the child's best interest, the court will generally not make it an issue. Generally, child support obligations are determined by a strict formula set out in NAC 425.140. However, parties are allowed to deviate from this formula in some circumstances. When there is a deviation, a decree must explicitly demonstrate all conditions are satisfied. A decree missing such terms may be sent back for revision, causing further delay.

The courts will generally accept the parties' agreement on this issue so long as no one is left a public charge as a result. For example, if the denial of spousal support would result in one spouse being eligible for government benefits, the court may bring the parties in for questioning. That's why it's important to draft the decree to avoid raising any issues.

The courts are also generally accepting of the parties' agreements here as well so long as they're not too one sided. If they happen to be, a simple explanation in the decree may be helpful and move the divorce along. For example, a one sided provision may be offset by another provision elsewhere in the decree. In some rare instances where the terms are highly suspicious because they are so one sided the court may bring the parties in for questioning. This rarely occurs because most joint petition filers have limited assets.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.